View Single Post
Old 08-12-2011 | 03:35 AM
  #5902  
slowplay
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
We're very lucky to have Lee Seham's firm at DPA. I know you hate him because he decertified ALPA at UsAir. And his evidentiary report showing ALPA's abuses at TWA was instrumental in securing a verdict against ALPA.
Seham was not a lawyer in the TWA case. The plaintiff TWA pilots did try unsuccessfully to get Seham qualified to testify as an expert witness at trial, and he issued the report that is floating around the web as a proffered basis for that testimony.

ALPA objected to his being qualified as an expert witness. The following is an excerpt from what the judge had to say in an oral ruling barring the Lee Seham report and his potential testimony.

For the foregoing reasons, defendant's motion to
strike the reports of McCormick and Seham and bar their
testimony as experts at the trial is granted. Their opinions
are based far more on speculation than on their "knowledge,
skill, experience, training or education." Their purported
testimony is not the product of discernible, let alone
reliable, principles and methods.

So what other untruths do you have for us today, Carl?
Reply