Originally Posted by
Bucking Bar
Carl, both those who wrote the language have an entirely different view of it and they are (to say the least) offended by your and my criticism.
I think a big test will be the subjective weight restriction v/s Type Certificate or other objective limitation. We have what we have and we will both see how it stands up. I hope the ALPA experts are correct and it holds.
The DPA, responsibly, says that they want polling data and input before making any positions on supposed contractual language. So you and I really can't say how they would do things differently.
ALPA legal is offended because we are ****ed that they did a poor job?
Cry me a river.