Originally Posted by
forgot to bid
In the PWA they had to make the provision that as of Oct08 or the signing of the contract that Section 1 didn't apply to NWA.
So had they made NWA a holding company wouldn't it have been a violation of Section 1 without the provisions of the new PWA? And what about NWA's Section 1?
Pretty good memory there. Actually, our leverage was that NWA's flying of the pacific routes was a violation of Delta's Section 1. Delta was faced with either keeping us separate, or combining us but stopping all pacific routes flown by NWA.
Carl