Originally Posted by
jheath
Oh yeah, everyone knows that the media, with their vast flying experience, always gets everything pertaining to aviation correct in their reports. Can't wait to read about another "engine stall."
Jay, dude, I'm done arguing with you. I'm clearly not the only person who disagrees with you. It's no secret we don't get along, and that's fine, because some people just don't get along. I wish it hadn't come down to you spreading blatant lies about me to other people, but that's neither here nor there. The truth is, you and I have been on the line for the same amount of time; about two months, going on three. The fact that you continue to argue this point against guys with decades more experience than us both is baffling. Perhaps you haven't had to work that hard or had much fun in your three months of part 121 flying. But maybe you should allow for the idea that you don't in fact know everything and sometimes you just might be wrong, though your attitude here is completely unsurprising to me.
You may be mixing me up with someone else. I have no problem with you (I have no clue who you are) and what lies are you talking about? I have been working in aviation for 5 years. Flying 121 for 4 years - been on the line almost as long. That is why I bolded the part above, it appears you do not know the truth or have made up truths in your mind that don't exist in reality.
I am not a seasoned pro but I do count my time by the thousands - but why does that matter? I am still active in both part 121 flying and GA flying. That is what my opinion is based on. I would be willing to bet that less than 2% of airline pilots are still active in GA flying. I posted the article just because is it relevant and there are still some facts/quotes from the FAA and relevance sources. Do you discount any opinion/source of information that you do not agree with? And then make personal attacks? I was having fun in this debate but it is clearly rubbing some people in the wrong way. What gives?