Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
Total BS reroute. You wouldn't know how to list an undistorted fact. No surprise there.
Carl
Try to pay attention Carl, straight from the DPA's own website.
"Unfortunately for the authors, evidence was left behind that DPA was able to analyze and use, pointing to specific Delta pilots. Delta management was provided the evidence because the Delta brand was being tarnished and the videos violated Delta's Social Media Policy. Management committed to throwing the “full weight of Delta Air Lines” behind the prosecution of this unprofessional behavior. It is sad that careers may be in jeopardy because individuals can find no better way to respond to DPA assertions."
Wow, the DPA brags about turning a pilot in because he damaged the Delta brand. Really, or did the DPA not like the message and was using defense of the Delta brand as a pretext to silence free speech?
The DPA also admits, on it's own website, to gathering photographic evidence in the pilot lounge.
Carl, either you are a liar, or the DPA is, but it's all in the DPA's own communication.
To recap, according to the DPA, the DPA turned a pilot in to the CPO for violating company policy and the DPA was in the lounge gathering photographic evidence.
I can't wait for the DPA hat police, maybe they'll gather photographic evidence of pilots not wearing their hats and provide it to the CPO.