Originally Posted by
UAL T38 Phlyer
One would think, if a whistle-blower said to a POI: "My company is doing something ill-advised, we've told them, they won't stop, and we are concerned," that said POI would be required to step-in.
Having had a few Pilots (CAL) in the JS doing their weekly pilgrimage from IAH-DEN working on various Flt Ops stuff with their UA counterparts, it's been interesting to hearing what's been going on out at TK as both side work on
'developing the future'.
As of a few months ago, one of these Pilots did express the subtle dynamics of 'jockeying' between the two POI's as to who would potentially get the nob as the successor in the new Company. As sad as it is (and as much as one does not want to think it goes on to some degree), I wonder how much future 'job security' plays into how much a POI would be willing to "texture the waters" on something like that? I sure hope 'he' would do the right thing.