Originally Posted by OccupyRestSeat

Knew a guy (we'll call him Bob) who made some bad choices and got kicked out of the AF after a domestic assault plea. Bob got hired at Comair, but he'll never be hired at the mainline--and knows it. He would like nothing better than to be able to fly 777s, and would gladly do so for $120/hr.

The way I understand it, ALPA is obligated to support Bob's desire to fly 777s for $120/hr every bit as much as it supports my desire to fly 777s for $350/hr.

To make matters worse, I am required to subsidize Bob as he tries to undercut me. My dues go to ALPA, who in turn, route the money away from my best interests, and over to support Bob's agenda.

Why do we continue to be represented by an agent with such a blatant conflict of interest?