Originally Posted by
jsled
If they are going to give CAL guys a taste in exchange for extending some of UAL's domicile protections, I am all for it. A JCBA would be better, of course.
I agree Sled. UHC is set to make big $$ gains in 2011. My concern is that "some" will be blinded by the "few K's" in payouts that Jeff tosses their way. The company 'maybe' able to be appease some within the masses as the JCBA window drags on. As far as I'm concerned (as well as MANY others at L-CO are concerned), Profit Sharing is non-negotiable.....It's NOTHING that needs to be held over our heads in the fashion that the company has handed down up to this point.
Originally Posted by
jsled
I believe, if true, this is a good course of action for the company. If they start opening CAL bases in UAL domiciles before sli integration, it will get UGLY, IMO. Injunction or no, guys will be ****ED.
This would ALSO pertain to the L-UAL opening up Pilot Bases in L-CAL bases during this same TPA period.....IE IAH-Airbus.....right???
AGAIN Sled.....As the OP stated, it's all rumor up to this point. You points are well taken.