Originally Posted by
N2264J
What I find puzzling is you quote one guy and believe that's a credible counter weight to 98% of climate scientists who don't agree.
Unless Dr. Theon's work is peer review, it's just an opinion.
Wasnt that the point of the E Mails. Dont peer review dissent.
And with physics, chemistry, and biology you have experiments that are repeatable and verifyable; not only that their models actually make predictions that come true.
Or as Michael Mann said:
The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't.
Think that made it into any of Mr. Mann's peer reviewed work?