Originally Posted by
DAL 88 Driver
You're still missing the point. ALPA National lawyers are the ones who help craft the legal language in our contract and in the contracts of regional pilots who benefit from getting our flying. ALPA National lawyers are the ones who give legal advice to us and to regional pilot groups with competing interests to ours. They have to do their best to benefit ALL of the pilots they legally represent. This is a clear conflict of interest.
UCAL pilots have MUCH more of a "competing interest" to DAL pilots, don't hear any conspiracy theories about them? USAPA has "competing interests" to DAL pilots and yet DPA hired the SAME law firm that had competing interests, OH GAWD!!!!!
Regional pilot groups DO NOT have any more of a competing interest than USAPA or UCAL.
Regional pilot groups only have a competing interest in their OWN company!
If Pinnacle Holdings or SkyWest Holdings used the same lawyers as ALPA I might agree with you.
Can I ask what you think the motivation for ALPA lawyers to 'tank our scope clause" would be?