Originally Posted by clancy

T, revisiting the SLI can be done in a number of ways without directly addressing it. Look at the C20 resolution from RW that asked for extra DC for the former north 2007 hires. There has also been talk of actuarial modifications to former north retirement assumptions to "equalize" benefits north v. south. Neither of those two made any headway, but the idea is there. There will always be people that feel like they got the shorted in an SLI outcome, and look for ways to improve their position. The DPA leadership is mostly former N. They seem to be the most dissatisfied with the SLI.