Originally Posted by
Releasemaster
Interesting that most indviduals are retired from there respective professions by 65. Even if what they did was thier passion, they seemingly look forward to enjoying retirement. I know there is small population that solider on in some fields, such as medicne. I also know flying is a passion to most pilots, regardless of age, however what I don't get is why so many pilots insist on staying to 65. Can a passion not be enjoyed outside a widebody cockpit? Maybe I'm waaayyy wrong on this,(and I'm sure I am to some), but wouldn't a career pilot at 60 let alone 65 have the money to purchase or otherwise aquire an interest in a plane that they could continue the pursuit of their passion in without having the hassel and "work" related strings of commanding an airliner?
Sure I know their not getting paid outside of retirement accounts, but then is $ the passion or flying?
Again I'm sure there are those that will cheer me and those that will curse me, but that is my first musing on the age 65 debate.
It may be true that most retire from their respective professions at 65. There are some who retire at 55, but whether they retire at 55 or "soldier on" to 65 that is their choice isn't it? And just maybe, they don't think pursuing their passion is "work" or a "hassle". As far as acquiring a small interest in a plane, all things being equal, I'd rather be paid to pursue my passion. Then if that doesn’t satisfy it; well you know what they say: it’s cheaper to rent.