Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
Sadly, that is the essence of DALPA MEC communications. Either failing to address the real issues or deliberately spreading misinformation. This latest communique is just the latest example.
Carl
Not sure I agree with that - I get so much ALPA stuff in my mail box it's hard to keep up.
Reference Brady, it sounds like it's a weak case, and they just got lucky with one lower court, and appeals will likely reverse that ruling. Mediation is the norm at this point before moving on to appeals.
That said they still did not address the possibility the ruling is upheld and the limits of Kitty-Hawk insurance. A rational of nothing to worry about, I'm sure well prevail because our case is good and there's is not is not exactly warm and fuzzy inspiring.
The courts are full off unexpected rulings - many times more than ALPA has said RJ's will feed the mainline and cause growth or develop a route until it's profitable and then shift to larger aircraft.