Originally Posted by alfaromeo

Just one more case where you are either:

1. Intellectually lazy
2. Sloppy and incomplete
3. Deliberately trying to deceive us

I am not sure which you want to claim. This is the plaintiffs brief. Their request was denied, in fact denied with a bit of a rebuke from the judge. All of this document destruction nonsense was disallowed from the trial. It was not ever discussed or brought before the jury.

So please, tell me, is it 1, 2, or 3. This seems to be the modus operandi of the DPA crowd lately. Deception, sloppiness, laziness. It seems that your main point now is to attack ALPA on any grounds with no regards for the truth at all. So it didn't make it into the Touch and Go because it is all a bunch of hooey.

DPA is now trying to stick their heads into the business of CAL and UAL. I thought they were supposed to be worrying about Delta pilots only. Why are they sticking their noses into other airline's business? Oh yeah, their lawyer got fired from his last job as is looking for another sucker. That explains it.