Originally Posted by
Gomerglideslope
I would have to "imagine" it....it is this sort of emotional, non-sensical name calling that assures DPA will never represent DAL (of course that is just my opinion)
Gomer, you're not doing the cause of the ALPA-phile any good if you continue to use words improperly. I know one of the main DALPA talking points is to characterize anything DPA as emotional and name calling. But look again at my post that you just characterized as emotional and non-sensical name calling:
Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
That DALPA is long gone in favor of constructive engagement and attending each other's kids birthday parties. If you don't believe me, ask the guy who negotiated contract 2000. He's a strong DPA supporter now.
Imagine that.
Carl
First, you do know that "constructive engagement" is the official strategy of DALPA don't you? Second, you do know that DALPA MEC officicals and management officials attend the birthday parties of each others' children, don't you? Third, you do know that the negotiating committee chairman that negotiated Delta's C2K is now a strong DPA suppporter, don't you?
There's not a single part of my post that is non-factual. Facts are not emotional or name calling. I'm not saying you should give up on stating the DALPA talking points of everything DPA being emotional, but you probably should only apply it to emotional or name calling posts.
Carl