Originally Posted by
Bucking Bar
Reading JM's writings leaves one with the impression that he's a bright man with good analytical abilities. Many would like to hear (or read) his thoughts which explain why he supports a representational change during Section 6. It would be interesting ...
On the other hand, what are the average DAL pilot's opinion of Contract 2000? Sure, it had high pay rates, but it began falling apart almost instantly. I will have to check my notes, but I believe the first scope concessions were within 6 months of ratification, it was then modified several more times (indicating failure) before being mostly wiped out by agreement in bankruptcy.
C2K was good for headlines, but was it sustainable? Did it make good sense? Curious what others think.
It was also good for morale. Until it started to fall apart of course.