Originally Posted by
EWRflyr
And how do we address the issue of say the 787 under what you said above? A highly composite, lower weight aircraft which can/will go further possibly carrying the same amount of fuel as the plane is it intended to replace.
May need to be a paradigm shift in thinking about how we determine pay.
I don't disagree with this statement in reference to the composite airplanes.
Are you suggesting that the CAL pilots pay banding propasal is the solution?