View Single Post
Old 02-10-2012 | 10:35 AM
  #52  
bkaz
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Question

Originally Posted by EWRflyr
And how do we address the issue of say the 787 under what you said above? A highly composite, lower weight aircraft which can/will go further possibly carrying the same amount of fuel as the plane is it intended to replace.

May need to be a paradigm shift in thinking about how we determine pay.
I don't disagree with this statement in reference to the composite airplanes.

Are you suggesting that the CAL pilots pay banding propasal is the solution?
Reply