Search

Notices

Paybanding question.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2012 | 08:15 AM
  #61  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

bump. We are having this very same discussion over at DAL, and are hearing some of the very same arguments. I haven't read this thread cover to cover - yet - but I think the two camps are the same here as over at DAL. TO me it just makes sense to get the most money into the most pilots' pockets as soon as possible, and banding might accomplish that. I have been asking for those guys that advocate the productivity argument to explain to me why we should continue that line of thought since we as pilots have zero input as to what airplane - not to mention the quantity of those airplanes - that management buys.
Reply
Old 03-02-2012 | 08:58 AM
  #62  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by catan
Spoken like a true company man....
Interesting that you ignored the rest of his post. But I guess the rest of your contract is perfect.
Reply
Old 03-02-2012 | 09:34 AM
  #63  
SoCalGuy's Avatar
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,086
Likes: 0
From: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Interesting that you ignored the rest of his post. But I guess the rest of your contract is perfect.
TS-
Word to the wise.....CATAN (who also dresses in drag as "Dumbfounded", and "Dexim") has been added to several "ignore lists". Since such time, many of us have found minor doses of tranquility while checking-in on APC.

Suggest you do the same if you plan on stopping by often!
Reply
Old 03-02-2012 | 10:28 AM
  #64  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by SoCalGuy
TS-
Word to the wise.....CATAN (who also dresses in drag as "Dumbfounded", and "Dexim") has been added to several "ignore lists". Since such time, many of us have found minor doses of tranquility while checking-in on APC.

Suggest you do the same if you plan on stopping by often!
Gracias! Or how ever you say thanks in SoCal. It's 'much obliged' in East Tennessee
Reply
Old 03-10-2012 | 10:29 AM
  #65  
New Hire
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Slammer
Take a look at another ALPA carrier. Delta/NWA. 747and777 are pay banded do your history is not correct.
The reason why DAL/NWA pay the same for the 777 and 747 is because those were the largest aircraft either company brought to the table. DAL had no 747s and NWA no 777s. That is not the case here. We have 777s and 747s whereas you guys only have 777s. You guys are completely missing the point of what is best for the entire pilot group after the merger.

We want un-banded AND industry leading pay rates for every airplane. We want every airplane to immediately go up in pay. One day, after the merger, when you get a 747 bid, YOU WILL WANT it to be at the top of the pay scales as well. The LUAL pilots do NOT want to see the 777 pilots take a concession for the 747. In our eyes, the DAL 777/747 pay level (not saying I want their rate) is fine for the 777, but the 747 should pay MORE. These aircraft are 200k lbs apart, the 747 carries significantly more payload and farther.

Using this logic, if the 747 is retired in 5 years, the 777 will STILL be at the top of the industry.

As for the UPS guys, they're just like the SWA guys. They worked for peanuts for 25+ years which finally brought all of us down to them. Do not be impressed.
Reply
Old 03-12-2012 | 05:53 AM
  #66  
EWRflyr's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 15
From: 737 CAPT
Default

Originally Posted by SeldomWork
The reason why DAL/NWA pay the same for the 777 and 747 is because those were the largest aircraft either company brought to the table. DAL had no 747s and NWA no 777s. That is not the case here. We have 777s and 747s whereas you guys only have 777s. You guys are completely missing the point of what is best for the entire pilot group after the merger.

We want un-banded AND industry leading pay rates for every airplane. We want every airplane to immediately go up in pay. One day, after the merger, when you get a 747 bid, YOU WILL WANT it to be at the top of the pay scales as well. The LUAL pilots do NOT want to see the 777 pilots take a concession for the 747. In our eyes, the DAL 777/747 pay level (not saying I want their rate) is fine for the 777, but the 747 should pay MORE. These aircraft are 200k lbs apart, the 747 carries significantly more payload and farther.

Using this logic, if the 747 is retired in 5 years, the 777 will STILL be at the top of the industry.

As for the UPS guys, they're just like the SWA guys. They worked for peanuts for 25+ years which finally brought all of us down to them. Do not be impressed.
That is why I have said with so few of the type I have no problem with the 747 being a separate pay category...assuming pay banding is the end pay table result that is. If these planes are going to be going away at some point, I see no reason to dilute whale pay by banding with 777s.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RVSM Certified
Flight Schools and Training
22
02-27-2009 12:04 PM
USMCFLYR
Military
16
08-28-2008 09:15 PM
USMCFLYR
Hangar Talk
3
08-23-2008 08:37 PM
cargo hopeful
Cargo
21
03-05-2006 06:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices