So a bunch of socialists are whining about the WSJ editorial policy? You're not exactly breaking new ground with that story.

Anyway, I read a pretty good article on the Forbes website that discusses the debate involving CO2, the climate, etc. I thought it was a pretty good article. Here is the thematic quote:

It turns out that the propositions that are “settled” and the propositions to which some like me are skeptical are NOT the same propositions. Understanding that mismatch will help explain a lot of the climate debate.

And here is the link to the whole thing:

Understanding the Global Warming Debate - Forbes

WW