View Single Post
Old 02-16-2012 | 06:34 PM
  #187  
jungle's Avatar
jungle
With The Resistance
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,191
Likes: 0
From: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes
Well, here's the thing, I've actually done research under a grant. I guess you think they are "handing these things out" to anyone who wants them, but nothing is further from the truth. If you don't support your findings/proposal and use scientific process, you look like an idiot and there are no grants to be found. I'm not sure what kind of "holiday" you think this stuff is for these people.

These "scientists" are usually students working on degees under the guidance of professors, the professors are the ones that usually stamp their name on the reports in many cases, but in some cases the students do and in some cases it's just those professors, but they aren't a bunch of people wearing lab coats with goggles that go to work and play with chemistry sets all day or something.

It sure is easy for you to sit on the sidelines and try to knock those who actually go through scientific process. Why don't you put your money where your mouth is and do the same thing? I guess I'm living proof that it's possible to not be "corrupted"...
Any chance you will ever at some point in the near term future get around to the actual scientific results, or is it your desire to hold us in suspense?

Since many of the models based purely on manmade CO2 have, over time, proven to be totally incorrect, it is by practical application that we must rely on actual results and data over time.
This means practical results in both our ability to control the climate, which is doubtful, and practical results from both a scientific and economic outlook. What say ye?

Last edited by jungle; 02-16-2012 at 06:51 PM.