Originally Posted by
FDXLAG
So you are saying that there arent 50 times the number of Climate Student today that there were in 1981? Or 50 times the amount of Climate grants available today? Put your money (that apparently barry took from me and gave to you) where your mouth is, give me a number.
So what if there is? That doesn't imply causation. You're changing your words and points as you go along. Originally you said "field of meterology". Make up your mind. How much money is there for other meterology grants? Is it comparable? How much of the research transcends just "long term" climate models with applicability to short term forcasting and better computer models? There's a slew of questions you'd have to research before you can support a made up idea of "field of meterology is 5000% bigger due to climate change".
This is too good!
