Originally Posted by
JamesNoBrakes
So what if there is? That doesn't imply causation. You're changing your words and points as you go along. Originally you said "field of meterology". Make up your mind. How much money is there for other meterology grants? Is it comparable? How much of the research transcends just "long term" climate models with applicability to short term forcasting and better computer models? There's a slew of questions you'd have to research before you can support a made up idea of "field of meterology is 5000% bigger due to climate change".
This is too good!
Ah now it "so what if there is". Yeah I still say that there are 50 times the meterology students today that there were 30 years ago. Universities see the gravy train and flop aboard. Just like food stamp recipients and free cell phones.
I have no idea how much money there is for other grants. Makes no difference. I am all for studing the weather. Your side is the one that says it settled give me 50 million and I can prove it. How much did the UN spend on Climate change in 1980 and how much in 2010 that ought to give us a clue.
An attack on man made climate change is not an attack on all science. Only a quack would pretend it was.