Originally Posted by
kc135driver
Problem is, and we all know it, both of our MC's will argue from these extreme positions, giving the arbitrator a pretty wide range to miss and get it wrong, in my opinion. It is basic arbitration theory, the closer the sides are going into arbitration the more equitable the decision.
kc135driver, great observation. I learned something new today. Going in with extreme positions could be a crapshoot, someone may win big, someone may lose big. Greater compromise will mean greater predictability.