Originally Posted by
EWR73FO
But in the same breath do you also find it acceptable for a 1999 with 10 years of furlough to be placed in front of a 2005 hire that has been a 737 captain at CAL?
I'm not advocating a staple and I don't think most CAL pilots want a senority grab. We want the same thing most UAL pilots want; a fair and equitable integration. Just what that is, remains with the MC's and the arbitrator.
A 99 hire wouldn't have 10 years of furlough.... Not even close.
Also, didn't USAir get the short end of the SLI straw when it argued for DOH and was unwilling to compromise with the arbitrator?
Hence, the revised ALPA merger policy?