Originally Posted by
AxlF16
I'm a bit surprised here... I was expecting crickets to this question. Thank you for stepping up and stating the OBVIOUS position that your union has taken. This approach, that you shamelessly relish in, will come back to bite you squarely on the ass. It's jagoffs like you that make me wish this forum wasn't anonymous. How about taking this line of BS to a forum where you have to sign your name?
Axl,
Maybe your comments were in reference to something else ewrbasedpilot stated that bothered you. If I missed that my apologies, but I do have a question.
I'm curious as to how a relative seniority integration is a "line of BS" in your view? To me it seems that this is the middle of the road view/position on SLI. It's not the extremes of either side (i.e. UAL pilots: staple the CAL guys; CAL pilots: staple the UAL pilots...we know neither is realistic and won't happen) but a more fair idea to integrate the list. Didn't DL/NW end up with something close to a relative seniority list within a few percent?
Honestly, I don't spend any time thinking about the SLI because we won't decide it, arbitrators will and I won't be on the team making the arguments. I don't even discuss it in the cockpit, but was curious since it seems to be brought up here.