View Single Post
Old 03-14-2012, 11:51 PM
  #1  
satpak77
Working weekends
 
satpak77's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 2,384
Default RNAV / course reversal question

OK, maybe I need a fire suit for the flaming I will get. Silly IFR-101 question, but it came up. Adult mature discussion requested.

look at this approach plate

http://dtpp.myairplane.com/pdfs/SC-3/00226R17L.PDF

Is the holding pattern/course reversal MANDATORY at PUCIK. Assume I am inbound from San Antonio. MANDATORY, or can I hit PUCIK and track the approach inbound from PUCIK. Outside PUCIK, 3000 is the recommended altitude. MSA circle is 2600, so I am already above the MSA.

I don't "need" a course reversal I am already almost lined up. Plus, above MSA circle.

Assume night time, tower closed. Shooting the approach in IMC. No vectors. Houston Center can't paint me/give vectors. Again, altitude wise, I am not gonna hit anything.

Assume I self-descended from legal MEA (with ATC approval) upon penetrating MSA circle, to 3000 (again above MSA altitude). Now I am almost lined up with PUCIK, say 10 miles north of PUCIK. Late night, tired, not in the mood to do a course reversal/holding pattern.

Not a trick question, this scenario was discussed the other day with some of us. My contention is that altitude wise, I am complying with chart requirements and have navigated myself to PUCIK and then inbound, safely, tracking the inbound course. My partners "take" was that it was not "legal" and not what ATC expects. I don't fathom freight dog Lear-25's coming in from YIP hitting PUCIK as they come southbund into LRD and do a course reversal burning XXX lbs Jet-A. Well maybe they do, I don't know.

Thanks
satpak77 is offline