Originally Posted by
Free Bird
Well sir, I respectfully disagree with your view on this. I do know that if with each contract we keep giving up a little more Scope at a time, there will come a time when there is nothing left as ALPA keeps moving the chains with each TA.
Really is interesting that in regards to not giving our jobs away we can have such opposing views. Or are we not in agreement that we shouldn't give away our jobs?
Thanks for being respectful in your disagreement; I will do the same.
We both want the same thing as an end result, we just weem to disagree about the path to get there. I think we both know this can't be the TA that resolves all Scope issues, so the question is about the best way.
I think this TA adresses many large, middle, and small-gauge Scope issues. I'm glad we don't add a new larger airplane, and I'm not particularly obsessed about adding more of a permitted aircraft, provided the end result is that we don much more of our own flying at the end.
I think you see a path where turning this TA down gets us what you and I both want, and I see that path as a dead-end, which doesn't connect with our objectives over time.