-Q&A session was very contentious, with 90% of the pilot angst focusing on the proposed pay rates.


I think the above quote is the most significant part of the CVG summary. I'm still on the fence as the whether I'm voting yes/no, but if I choose to vote no it will be the 70 additional 76 seaters that does it. The problem with a scope NO vote is I don't think most of the NO voters will have scope as their primary concern apart from those who read APC.

And if the TA gets voted down with pay as the primary concern, then I'm sure the company would be happy to give us another 10-15% more for 82 seats. I guess I fear with pay as the primary concern a reworked TA with additional pay will have WORSE scope what is being offered now.


By the way, I'm an APC idiot. How do I quote a message?