Originally Posted by
Jack Bauer
Haha nice spin spinmeister. Saying we didn't accept 82 seaters while selling the troops on more permanent 90 seaters (with 76 seats including first class) is disingenuous at best.
NO MORE LARGE RJ'S along with real contract improvements. That would be a partial victory. Parking large and small RJ's with a large pay bump and better work rules. That would constitute a victory. Please review those definitions. Thank you.
I give up what am I spinning?
Is it when I say our Scope sucks - is that spin? Don't look for disagreement where non exists. The saying tilting at windmills comes to mind. I have not even decided how I am voting yet - leaning No FYI, but am in no rush to decide.
Yes - I am for NO MORE LARGE RJ's along with real contract improvements - Where do I vote yes for that?
Scoop