Originally Posted by
Bill Lumberg
Why don't we put RJs that have a chance at making money (20 more seats for the 102 70 seaters that would replace 50s on their routes, especially if you get rid of 150 of them) on routes that will probably stay RJs routes. On the big RJ routes that do make money, let's throw a 717 on there and try to make more. Very simple.
I hate to break it to you fella but your line of thinking is exactly how we got into this RJ mess in the first place with help from the likes of Moak and others. Dumb! Dumb! Dumb!