Originally Posted by
Bill Kilgore
So let me see if I got this right. You feel that these 4 are guilty until proven innocent (much like management does) and only once someone convinces you that pilot #4 was telling the truth and that the families of pilots 1-3 were in HKG enough to satisfy you and management's definition of "residency" will you then consider forking over the cost of a Starbuck's to support your fellow pilots. Brilliant.
Where do we find such people. Totally unsat.
How the heck did you get that from my post? I have no idea if they are innocent or guilty. That's why I'd like to hear their side or from someone who is familiar with their situation. So far I haven't heard anyone dispute the company's allegations against pilots 1-3 in detail. That's disturbing to me. I don't know if they actually got caught with their hand in the cookie jar or not. I'd like to hear more, that's all.