Originally Posted by rvr350

Bill,

I don't think most of the no voters wanted the cake and eat it too. They just want some balance in the TA that improves their QOL and also protect their careers as well. You vote your way because you feel the payraises are enough and you feel the 200 50seat rj removal and 70 large rj is acceptable.

I want solid scope improvement, aka close loopholes for future rjs, and sunset clauses. I am not foolish enough to demand we take down dci overnite, but i dont want to see us giving them a lifeline either. That didnt happen, and that's why i vote the way i vote. You dont need to preach us what is surrounding us, how our competitors are doing. I'd rather mind our own shop, and take care of our problems that was caused by no one other than us, in the first place.