Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
What I am saying is that the number of items that need to be fixed is minimal, and overall cost per year is not outrageous.
What is the cost per year of your proposed fixes (over 30 items you said)?
What vote would they yield?
If the vote count was 49% in favor, are you just trying to get to 51%?
If the company has a "Plan B", how close does that plan come in value to "Plan A"?
Do your fixes make Plan A's requisite contractual relief so costly that it virtually eliminates the financial superiority of Plan A, thereby driving the company to Plan B, and negating the leverage the pilot group has?
Isn't that called "overplaying your hand"?
[Looks like you went back and changed your post while I was replying]
I'll say this, if your belief that a fix is easy is not reason for voting against the deal, what real world plan do you have? That's in a real world where there's two parties to a negotiation and we're not just typing on our keyboards.
What is the cost per year of your proposed fixes?
What vote would they yield?
If the vote count was 49% in favor, are you just trying to get to 51%?
If the company has a "Plan B", how close does that plan come in value to "Plan A"?
Do your fixes make Plan A's requisite contractual relief so costly that it virtually eliminates the financial superiority of Plan B?
[Looks like you went back and changed your post while I was replying]
I'll say this, if your belief that a fix is easy is not reason for voting against the deal, what real world plan do you have? That's in a real world where there's two parties to a negotiation and we're not just typing on our keyboards.