Never mind the fact that the 300 is a squeeze on the taxiways for 33R-15L (people forget how wide the wheelbase and wingspan are on the dash). I've landed the 300 on it many times and was honestly more concerned about making sure the captain wasn't putting a wheel in the grass or nicking the glideslope shack while taxiing (I also don't drag and chop it on landing either). That runway works great for all the little corporate jets that use it, but I would have to imagine that the 300 was on the upper end (dimension-wise) of the planes that were using it.

Exactly. 5-6 flights a day isn't worth worrying about. We also have a lot more flexibility in terms of maintaining a wide range of speeds on approach, flying short approaches, 20kt tailwind landings, and intersection departures that should partially make up for not using that runway.