View Single Post
Old 11-21-2012 | 03:18 AM
  #94  
bitter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 757niteflyer
Also remember the new hires + that love to come on here and stir the pot they would love to see ATI fail, all assets would go to ABX and they could go back carrying seniority. I know a lot of ATI people, carried a lot of them in my Jumpseat. Great guys, I look toward moving forward and working together.
Neither CCIA or ATI have any assets. Get familiar with your company.
Everything is leased from CAM and could be removed anytime Hete wants. The fact that he kept both ATI and CCIA operating should turn a light bulb on, in a curious mind.
Operating three carriers that essentially all do the same, for the same entity with the same equipment......one is losing its ass, the other is tiny and you keep pumping cash at the duplicity, mmmme why?
Imagine how expensive three sets of everything is? Its is way more expense than the Abx crew costs would have been to fly everything. So it wasn't/isn't about money.

Understand one thing, CCIA was kept around for one reason, so Hete could have flying done at cheaper rates than his contract at Abx allowed.
Its about politics and union busting.
Do not trust this management team at either ATI or Abx or CCIA. They are all run by ex Airborne guys. The end game is always union busting divide and conquer tactics, which so far both CCIA and ATI have fallen for hook line and sinker.

PS, why the hate for your perhaps soon to be brethren at Abx?

Stop looking at this like a pilot with rose colored glasses on, step on the other side and look at this from a managers position.
CCIA was a small poorly managed bottom feeding airline that eacked out meager profits. Not the great lion you keep bragging about.
You brought 3-4 savable aircraft to the table and "whip saw". I fail to see anything more.
In fact IMHO the main reason CCIA was kept alive was for union busting and nothing more.
Reply