Originally Posted by
80drvr
You already gave on scope -- the judge agreed with the company's 1113(c) motion and rejected our contract. From here on out, the company can do pretty much whatever they want on scope unless we ratify a contract that says otherwise. The scope in the TA is far from perfect, but it's leaps and bounds beyond the term sheet and in the ballpark of UAL/DAL. Voting no is essentially voting yes to no scope.
Disagree. Your assumptions above are based on AMR never needing a CBA again and they do. I believe we will have the chance to negotiate again, but when and with who is the question. Still voting no.