Originally Posted by
SUX4U
As I am not at UA but would like to be someday I have serious interest in what this new TA could mean for a future there. You do make some good points, but the way you constantly talk down to people really discredits your views to the point I almost skim past them. Just food for thought when you are attempting to possibly sway people at UA to side with you on the vote...
Yes, you are 100% right and I need to slow down. The problem is I only have a week to strike up a true conversation, and folks here seem adamant in their opinions with no show of facts and that is driving me to overwhelming frustration, but thank-you for taking time to notice.
Problem is I only have 10 minutes per day to answer 100 posts most of which are grossly uniformed or swayed by false logic. The best example of this is scope. The naysayers are making HUGE assumptions regarding the profitablity of 50 seaters, the definition of 76 seaters, and the availability of 70 seaters none of which have any basis in reality, but that is not being debated. It's the same principle of national politics. Our nation is facing massive debt which could never be solved by raising taxes so some cut in benefits is necessary whether it be means testing or raising age limits but that is never discussed and the result will be increasing debt resulting in sudden devaluation of the dollar via a spike in interest on the 10 yr bond, but that is so far above the general public's knowledge that it's sad and the same appears to be true with this contract.
All of that was a complex way of saying "Thank-you".
Joe