Originally Posted by
captjns
This was a question posed by FMI from post 52
I am, again hoping when I assume that FMI was not talking about crossing a picket line, but seeking employment elsewhere to support his family.
Your response to FMI's supposition was:
I can't beleive that any union, or union member that would endorses the ethos any member should deny their family's welfare or needs by securing employment elsewhere.
Okay, let me dumb this down as far as I can manage:
It's a zero-sum game. Wait, not dumb enough. Here's what that means:
If you 'help'
your poor, hungry little tots by scabbing, then you are hurting
MY poor, hungry little tots by scabbing. And you think I should understand YOUR 'need' to hurt MY family? Good luck with that.