Originally Posted by
Gearswinger
I've only got the Saab and 200 to compare, and the Saab was much more fun to fly. Sure the 200 has an APU so it's more comfortable, but the Saab flew low to the ground in and out of smaller airports, very little automation and was more involving. Also, no 2+ hr legs that make me feel like I'm going to fall asleep. It was more fun.
Props are fun, I miss FLYING a prop. With that said a jet that is doing 2hr+ legs is better QOL as you are not working off the clock as much, it is more comfy and has more automation. Now if that jet was at a mainline we would be in much better shape. As far as working I rather fly a jet, but if I wanted to fly I would want a prop any day.