Originally Posted by
CanoePilot
It would be unfair to place a furlough above an active employee.
A "fair" is where you get cotton candy.
Many of those furloughees have active service under their belts, and that is going to be taken into account. I would be shocked to see furloughees stapled to the bottom. Longevity HAS to be taken into account.
Plus we have a new merger policy, so this ISL should set some new precedents.