Originally Posted by
Mitch Rapp05
Are you saying a furloughed pilot at, say 103%, could end up at 95%, displacing a current CAL pilot at 95% to 100+%????
(I notice that you are conveniently ignoring the "windfall" portion of the merger policy). Merger policies and arguments aside though, how is that even fair much less ETHICAL!?!
Most UAL pilots voted yes on this contract under the guise of forging a new unity. To believe that a furloughed pilot has the above entitlement destroys unity!
What I said was why should a pilot with 13 years of active employment become junior to one with 2 or 3?
Also, there is no 103% seniority. You are either a pilot on the UAL Pilots Seniority list, or you aren't. But the list is the list.