Originally Posted by
Mitch Rapp05
Are you saying a furloughed pilot at, say 103%, could end up at 95%, displacing a current CAL pilot at 95% to 100+%????
(I notice that you are conveniently ignoring the "windfall" portion of the merger policy). Merger policies and arguments aside though, how is that even fair much less ETHICAL!?!
Most UAL pilots voted yes on this contract under the guise of forging a new unity. To believe that a furloughed pilot has the above entitlement destroys unity!
Did I miss something? Do we know how the 2 groups actually votd on this pos contract?