Originally Posted by
CanoePilot
It would be unfair to place a furlough above an active employee.
Equally unfair would be to place an '07 hire "senior" to a '99 hire.
How about that same '99 hire reverting to 4 years of longevity post TA ratification...What the EF over???
The circular argument that the SLI represents is foolish and unproductive as they get. NO answers will be had on this or any forum...it just doesn't matter...