No, there is no scabbing here, no picket lines were crossed.


But here's the thing. Anyone who voted yes now has no right to make fun of a scab, because the scab does what he does for the same reason voted yes: have to pay bills, mortgages, feed family, and looking out for #1. These reasons have been posted as reason for yes vote. Same reasons, in one case taking a regional industry concessionary contract, and another, crossing a picket line. I'm just curious where the line is drawn? At what point does paying family bills and feeding family get overriden? Obviously, I would think most agree that scabbing is one of those things where you just don't do it. So your family misses bills, meals, and struggle. If it can be overridden for scabbing, why can't it be overriden for a regional industry concessionary contract?