View Single Post
Old 01-23-2013 | 08:30 AM
  #231  
nitefr8dog
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by b707guy
A lot of interesting ideas being offered here. But here's another: Whether or not anyone believes that Jakarta is real, let's assume that it is. I believe that would constitute intra-Asia. Maybe that's part of what's holding things up (again, I am only operating under the ass-u-me...ption that it will happen, not prognosticating that it might actually happen). Once that happens, ABX got nuttin on ATI to have a certificate worthy of continuation over ours.

Also, am I correct in the thought that CAM owns all of the airplanes in question here - ABX, ATI, soon to be ex-Cappy? If so, then does that take a little wind out of the sails behind the thought that DHL would want airlines with no assets? Huge element of control lost there. Cheaper in the short term, but (control your guffaws here...), I would hope that DHL still remembers how completely they got "served" a few years back in the US market.

As for Southern, not sure why AAWW doesn't go for them now. Seems they should be ripe for the picking. Besides, a good chunk of Atlas consists of ex-SAT refugees after the original shut down in 1998. I was one of them, but went to ATI.

I still think everything that is happening to us here under ATSG is in preparation for next year's re-up with DHL. We think it's ugly now? Just wait...
I am not sure "CAM owns" the aircraft I know for a fact when 600-750M worth of ABX aircraft went to CAM no money changed hands. Cam would have to come up with some serious cash before they could "claim" ownership. Now transfer to CAM.... a leasing company owned by ATSG for accounting purposes that is a different story. As far as ASIA goes...intra-Japan is the issue ABX has it as a one time only with after market cargo doors...whether that comes into play with ATI I have no idea.....
Reply