Originally Posted by
pinseeker
It does give an example. But wait, you just said you don't like examples. You really can't get over being recalled, can you?
The Example says "the pilot is paid". If the Example broke it down like Timeoff2fish did, it would be "more clear" -- which 4A2B said it could not be.
I'm not the only one who doesn't like "Intent language." Most pilots polled and surveyed rank getting rid of intent language very high on their list of improvements they would like to see in our CBA.
I got over being recalled a long time ago. Apparently you haven't.
Originally Posted by
pinseeker
Tony, you agreed that the company could implement a single bid pack and pay everyone 75 pay unless they touched a 76 under our current CBA. That is why we wouldn't be able to litigate if the LOA failed.
I agree.
So, explain to me why the MEC Chairman and Council 22 Officers have told us that litigation would be probable.
.