View Single Post
Old 03-24-2007 | 09:52 AM
  #3  
Led Zep
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Split S
Just a question of curiosity, if you were just coming into the civilian job market from the military without the PIC mins for FEDEX or UPS which job would you take and why? F/O on a 747 w/ an ACMI company and probably a 5yr upgrade, or F/O with a Legacy carrier on the 737 or MD-80 series and a 10yr upgrade? No I don't currently have job offers with both, just trying to understand the pro's and con's of both over the long run of a career...

Thanks for the opinions

-SS
Personally, I would go the freight route if I had to choose between the two. Compared to pax flying, cargo seems to provide much more stability over the long run. One scenario that needs to be addressed is this: if hiring slowed down and you were going to spend a considerable amount of time somewhere (i.e., 5+ years), would you rather it be a cargo airline or a passenger airline?

I have never flown passengers, so I can't comment on their side of the fence. However, I'll list the pros and cons of cargo for you as I see it.

Pros:

Stability is usually much better overall.
Not much time spent in airport terminals unless as a passenger.
No passenger-induced problems from the back.
Flights are catered. (most carriers)
Wide variety of routes to fly.
Business people can conference call - freight cannot.
Going to bed early in the morning instead of getting a wake-up call early in the morning.

Cons:
Some of the pairings can be long. Again, depending on the carrier.
Night flying can be more challenging physically.
For some people, long flight segments can be a challenge as opposed to multiple shorter ones.

This list is probably inconclusive, but these are a few of the pros and cons that come to mind. I have never flown ACMI freight, but hopefully this will help give you some insight.
Reply