This a cross examination of a sCAL expert:

Q- Well, let me just say the following.
With respect to Asia, for example. It --
Narita and Palau would both be a market which would
be reflected in these charts; correct?
A- If they were served by both carriers, yes.
Q- If they were served by either carrier.
A- Right.
Q- So Continental, flying somewhere in Asia
to Palau, would be the same in terms of a market,
would be the same as United flying from Chicago to
Hong Kong.
A- Or Narita to Seoul.
Q- That's what I'm trying to understand.
A- A short haul.
Q- It would be -- each one of those would be
a market; correct?
A- In this count; correct.
Q- All right. And these charts, Charts 8,
10, 12, and 14 don't say anything at all about the
frequencies between those city pairs?
A- No.
Q- And they don't say anything at all about
the available seat miles associated with any of
those markets; correct?
A- No.
But maybe I can help you a little bit.
I already testified yesterday both as to
traffic and seat miles and block hours. Continental
Airlines was more of an international carrier than
United.