SLI Transcript, Funny Stuff, LOL
#71
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Just wondering if you were a 2005 hire at CAL and holding a CA slot, would you be advocating what you do now? I hardly doubt it....... Hard to understand how a pilot that was on property for only a year
should go senior to someone who's never been furloughed and been on property for eight years. Where is the fairness in that?
should go senior to someone who's never been furloughed and been on property for eight years. Where is the fairness in that?
Let me ask you a few questions >> A Jan 2008 hire at CAL has at MOST 5 yrs and 2 months longevity (assuming they weren't furloughed...which I believe they were). I (Jan 1997 hire) have 16 years and 2 months longevity (I was never furloughed). Your proposed list has me in the middle of that group...where is the fairness in that??
You guys might want to think about the concept of longevity.
#72
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: 767 F/O
Just wondering if you were a 2005 hire at CAL and holding a CA slot, would you be advocating what you do now? I hardly doubt it....... Hard to understand how a pilot that was on property for only a year
should go senior to someone who's never been furloughed and been on property for eight years. Where is the fairness in that?
should go senior to someone who's never been furloughed and been on property for eight years. Where is the fairness in that?
Just wondering how YOU'D feel under the same circumstances, if you were a 96 UAL hire.
#73
In the meantime, thanks for the link.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



