Your not sorry and, trust me, I'm not upset. In fact I'm not the least interested in your analysis or your "historical facts". My initial point was that both sides are bringing equities to the table and I was trying to objective in allowing that both sides have valid arguments. Thanks for making it abundantly clear what a waste of time any attempt at objectivity is with s-UAL. Please return to your regularly scheduled pedantic bickering. If you really want to debate the validity of your "absolutes" I'll look forward to having that discussion in September...

In the meantime, thanks for the link.